At a time when it might be expected that the soaps might be easing off the gas before unleashing their big autumn story lines upon us Coronation Street have decided to explode over the last week with the demise of Kylie Platt. I liked Kylie and thought she was brilliantly played by Paula Lane, who in a way filled the gap that was created in the programme by the departure of her sister Becky, played by the ubiquitous Katherine Kelly but, and there’s a big but here, I did not want to know that she was being killed off.
Paula Lane (Kylie) and Katherine Kelly (Becky)
I’d seen online teasers suggesting character was about to meet its maker but had chosen not to click to find out more. In the queue in my local Co-op my eyes found themselves latching onto a whole row of TV/women’s magazines saying “Kylie Dies!” Why do people need to be told before the showing of the programme? It really is one of my television bug-bears. When Coronation Street aired its last live episode in which bad boy Callum was killed off, people were full of praise, largely because “they did not know that was going to happen”. I thought then that a lesson might be learnt and that fans did not need to be spoon-fed storylines months in advance. Is it because programme makers fear we will not watch if we don’t know what is happening? But why watch something when you know all that is about to occur, anyway?
Here’s a revolutionary idea- don’t give away big storylines and let us watch and those that have missed out can find out by word of mouth and watch on catch-up (which apparently most of us do anyway, according to programme makers). The casual audience can still be picked up and the programme fans can get the full enjoyment of the programme.
Luckily, on the day of transmission I didn’t see the copy of the “Daily Mirror” which, with all that is going on in the world, decided to go with a photo on its front page of Kylie sprawled on the cobbles before the programme was transmitted. Right, rant over (but don’t get me starting on BBC swapping the tennis over without notice when Andy Murray plays from BBC2 to BBC1 meaning that those recording the tennis got “The One Show” and “Masterchef” and fans of those shows got the tennis.)
My motive for this review is to highlight one of the most under-rated actors on British television who has played an absolute blinder this week, Jack P Shepherd. Jack often appears on shortlists of soap awards but is sidelined by the genre’s big-hitters (usually Danny Dyer or whoever is the central male character in “Eastenders” at the time). He has been a regular in the programme for over 16 years, since he was 12 years old. The eagle-eyed amongst you would have spotted him earlier than that. I’ve mentioned this before in my review of Happy Valley but back in 2000 the BBC series “Clocking Off” had an excellent episode in its first series called “Yvonne’s Story” which had “Happy Valley” future stars Siobhan Finneran and Sarah Lancashire as friends with both Jack P. Shepherd and Tina O’Brien playing Lancashire’s children. Obviously the chemistry was there from the start as soon afterwards both were cast to play the Platt children, and both are still playing these parts 16 years later.
David and Sarah meet a royal visitor
At the end of last Friday’s episode we left Kylie, stabbed in the street following a scuffle outside the kebab shop and before the 8.30 episode we were warned that we might find scenes upsetting and that was certainly right. I cannot remember when “Coronation Street” was as upsetting as the second episode that evening (and I’m even including Hayley Cropper’s assisted suicide). David cradled Kylie as life slipped away in what was a tour-de-force for both actors. From the opening moment when David charged down the surprisingly deserted cobbled street to clutch hold of his injured wife the tension never let up. David’s shock and lack of comprehension, aided by a lot of close-ups, was palpable and even though the A-list of the Street appeared to hover around the scene the most accomplished performances were from Shepherd and Lane and when the life ebbed away there was a bestial howl which was almost Shakespearean in its intensity. “Coronation Street” is often compared to Shakespeare and Dickens as all human life is there and it is one of Britain’s most important cultural markers. Two great things about these particular characters have been their ability to use humour, Jack is one of the funniest characters on the show, even if his humour is often in the darker realms and Kylie’s words to him that “as far as doctors go, you’d make a great hairdresser” at such a dreadful moment could not help but bring about a smile. With Gail (Helen Worth) and Audrey ( the great Sue Nicholls) arriving the scene played out with the intimacy of characters who had spent many hours together- with the relationship between David and his mum always particularly strong- as it must be in real life the things these two actors have shared. This is where continuing drama can shine above drama serials- there is so much shared history, going back years. The ensemble acting which the Coronation Street “families” can produce is so often sublime.
I’ve just watched the culmination of this death scene again for the benefit of this review and tears have once again filled my eyes. This does not happen to me with television very often and it’s probably because part of me can still remember the pre-teen who went off the rails after his pet rabbit, Barney, died. What will happen now he has lost the love of his life?
We watched David sitting on the sidelines as paramedics tried to revive his wife and, almost too painfully, lying down next to her. In the ensuing episodes we have seen absolutely appropriate reactions – the shock, the telling of the children, the anger of discovering the man who killed Kylie and nearly battering his head in with an iron bar. We all know how dangerous David can be.
This is the man who pushed his mother down the stairs, who has smashed all the windscreens of cars in the street and whose past has been decidedly troubled. We haven’t seen Psycho David for some years but he might not be too far away over the coming months. Whatever the scriptwriters have in store for the character we know that Jack P Shepherd will shine. On Wednesday’s episode the couple were reunited in the funeral home –which I don’t think in the 55 year history of the programme had ever been done before in a scene which was almost too difficult to watch – once again in close-up to register every reaction on David’s face and switching to the now expressionless one of Kylie. Difficult television- yes, but fantastic television.
David and Kylie
Comedy character Keith Lemon always refers to Jack as “the little northern cocky bastard” and that is part of his character but it is time to salute one of the best performers on television who is has been absolutely pitch perfect over the last few episodes.
“Coronation Street” is aired on ITV and these episodes should still, at time of writing, be available on ITV Hub catch-up services.
9 thoughts on “Coronation Street (2016) – A What I’ve Been Watching Review”
Couldn’t agree with you more. David Platt (Jack Shepherd)certainly grew into a consumate actor. As a child, already showed his talent. Although I never watched Clocking off, this little stint for David and Sarah (Tina O’Brien), provided a great opportunity to show how the acting sibling chemistry should work…David, growing up on the cobbles, was such obnoxious, devious little so and so…
Becky, (Katherine Kelly) has not done badly, since she has left. (Mr Selfridge, Happy Valley 2.)
Regarding the spoilers. Not sure I understand psychology of it. My personal explanation would be, the need of “weird” reassurance of viewers… eg. Leanne’s mysterious father of her child, Ian hadn’t have a clue, I knew, but didn’t tell him… What is strange, although I knew I still watched it…The revelation. Maybe in the future, only hints might be given out, not full disclosure.Not full scenes, just a narration…
I think I’ve watched “Coronation Street for so long that I want it to feel as much like real life as it can -to allow plots and storylines to reveal themselves without being signposted weeks in advance. If I worked on “The Street” as a scriptwriter or actor I think I would feel that everyone knowing what was going to happen would cheapen the experience in a way. I know this might just be a personal quirk of mine- I feel it particularly with “Coronation St” but I also cannot bear it when programmes have a “next week” trailer before the closing credits. If I want to know what will happen next week I’ll watch it then. I find myself always having to have the remote control in my hand for the last few minutes of a programme. Sometimes a character has been in peril at the end of some episode and you can tell instantly that they will be alright because there they are large as life in the trailer. That surely undermines all dramatic intent on the part of the writer. Now “Coronation St” does not do that very often (although it does when there are big storylines) but so many other drama serials do -and it drives me nuts, Monika!!
I agree with you, it would drive anybody to desperation. I have to come to a rescue of the producers or such likes responsible for spoilers…I think, personally, Corrie doesn’t need it.Who wants to watch it, he/she will, regardless. I forgot to mention though Congrats to Ms Oates, ever since she came on board, she spiced up the lot. Well done!Keep up the good work.Talking of Ms Oates, maybe she came up hard with the idea, to create more publicity in this way. It is only my guess though. Spoilers appeared before 2016, but I believe not as much as now. There is always a possibility of NOT reading/watching them.As for showing what appears in the next episode, let’s just say, if I was not impressed with the first part, no amount however long, trailers, will persuade me to continue watching and not going into specific examples…tonight’s Konrad Jones’s adaptation of his timeless book was far too one dimentional.The subtlety of the book is completely lost.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Correction. When I mentioned Conrad Jones, I meant his fictional book The Soft Target.
Tonight’s adaptation is of Joseph Conrad…Wires crossed. Sorry.
I haven’t watched any of the Joseph Conrad “Secret Agent”. I’ve never really got to grips with Conrad and on a warm Sunday evening it didn’t appeal
I have good news about:
Excellent link, Monika. Thanks for that!
Pingback: Snatch (2017 AMC) – A What I’ve Been Watching Review – reviewsrevues
Pingback: Brassic (Sky 1 2019) – A What I’ve Been Watching Review – reviewsrevues