It struck me whilst reading Deighton’s 1978 thriller how little British fiction I have read from the 1970’s. Even for the (very small) part of the decade when I had moved on to adult fiction it was thrillers from an earlier era and American blockbusters that were fuelling my reading habit. For some reason, contemporary British fiction did not appeal to me as a youngster and I haven’t really revisited the era to any great deal since.
I think this is largely due to the style of writing in vogue then. Deighton’s 12th of the 26 novels he has published to date (the last being “Charity” in 1996) is admittedly a brilliantly realised alternative history. Victory for the Nazis was an idea which cropped up from time to time in film and fiction since the end of the War. Philip K Dick’s “Man In The High Castle” appeared in 1962 but the very British feel of Deighton’s novel would certainly have caused a stir on publication. Small details have been thought out and worked through as if Deighton really inhabited this nightmarish world. In his introduction he states;
“Using (the) German data I drew a chain of command showing the connections between the civilians and the puppet government, black-marketeers and quislings, and the occupying power with its security forces and bitterly competitive army and Waffen SS elements.”
This level of detail, research and projection as to what might have been is very effective. I think, however, Deighton’s style of writing, typical for the time, has dated and led to me feeling somewhat let down by the reading experiences. It’s all strangely clipped, like a lot of the fiction of the day geared towards a male audience I feel it should be read out of the corner of the mouth with a cigarette on. I feel this way about, amongst others, Ian Fleming and Alastair Maclean so Deighton is in good company. This style, developed from American “hard-boiled” crime writers and film noir doesn’t allow for the characters to really connect emotionally and that for me is one of the real joys of reading. Main character Douglas Archer, a Scotland Yard Detective having to solve crimes in the new Nazi regime apparently has had a strong bond with colleague Harry Woods since Archer was a child when Woods was a father figure. Now his mentor’s senior this relationship just seemed like it should really sizzle, but I didn’t feel any real connection between them.
When Archer decides he has fallen in love it was one of the biggest surprises of the novel as from the scenes with his loved one there didn’t seem to be anywhere near enough of a spark for this to happen. What jars now is how understated it is all is. There’s a big action centrepiece which crept up on me and I found myself having to re-read to see what happened. In fact I did quite a lot of re-reading and what I missed what this real sense of feeling and emotions. It was no doubt a sign of the times (of the 70’s as well as the 40’s).
I think we’ve just got used to brasher, noisier, more emotional adventure novels. So I’m interested to see how this relates to the big-budget BBC five part adaptation which would have started by the time you are reading this. That was the reason I wanted to get this book read first. I’ll let you know what I think………………
SS-GB was published in 1978. It is currently available as a Harper Collins paperback
I read Goodbye Mickey Mouse some time ago and thoroughly enjoyed it. I liked his style of writing and having found the book amongst a pile waiting to go to the charity shop, I pulled it out for another read. (if I get time). It has always been my intention to read more Len Deighton I just haven’t got around to it. Maybe now I will, but that does depend on the time factor and the ever growing pile of unread books.
LikeLike
Hi Phil,
all sizzle, no sausage. I tell you how… So far, so “funny” adaptation. For me (sounding harsh as ever) none of the characters joint as they were supposed to…Len Deighton, maybe of the 70ties, but it is a mastery of adaptation that fell through. Judging on the part 1 only, it was all over the place…Not cracking your head, and asking what was that? Direction, sorry, the director who mainly influences what you see and how you perceive it, maybe be just as well from Mongolia. His German origin had no bearing.Still keep watching. It can get only better, or not. I am also a bit dubious about the main lead…I am not being overtly harsh here, but if anything, a great example of subtlety and acting skill can be taken from “The Halcyon”.Sometimes no words needed and you saw the unspoken lines on the actors faces. True acting…
LikeLike
I’ve watched it now, Monika. You can find my review of the first episode on here. I like your “all sizzle no sausage” comment, sums it up well!
LikeLike
Pingback: My 400th Blog Post – A What You’ve Been Reading Special – reviewsrevues